Page 291 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 291

Reducing High-Speed Rail Costs by Combined Double-Single Tracks




                              2.1.4      Rational investment analysis


                   Once all possibilities have been determined, a multi-criteria analysis will decide which one is
                   the best alternative, not only from the economic perspective (50% weight) but also in regard to
                   the quality from a technical standpoint (50% weigh).

                   To evaluate the economic perspective, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is performed on a long-
                   term scale, with a greater focus on their social benefits. The indicators used for this aim are
                   the following:
                   (a)     Benefit-cost ratio (BCR):















                   (b)     Payback period considering a useful life of 40 years (PB).













                   Regarding to the technical indicators, the following quality measures have been used:





                   (a)     QM index:


                                    Table 4. Weighing used for the definition of the QM index.


                          RT         1 <RT<1,05     1,05<RT<1,1  1,1<RT<1,15  1,15<RT<1,2            RT>1,2


                       Weighing           1              0.8            0.6             0.4            0.2


                         a)  Maximum relative travel time, RTmax
                         b)  Mean relative travel time, RTmean
                         c)  Continuation of services: score 1 if the Santander-Liérganes line is continued and 0 if
                            not.





                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  289
   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296