Page 290 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 290

Grande, Zacarías. Torralbo, Julia. Lobera, José Manuel. Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos. Castillo, Enrique.























                                          Figure 8. Illustration of the seven alternatives considered.


                The program not only minimizes costs and travel times, but also defines the optimal sequence
                of single- and double-track segments for each alternative. This makes it possible to estimate
                the construction costs of the infrastructure, as well as the savings compared to the double-
                track solution.
                Table 3 Cost comparison of the 7 alternatives considered. Santander-Bilbao Case




                                          Segment              Track Typology        Budget (Mill)      Cons-
                 Alterna-  Case                                 HS                                       truc-
                   tive                                               HS Sim-                            tion
                                1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10   Dou-    ple         M€          M£
                                                                ble                                     Saving
                           1.1                                  0%     100%       904.20      795.69     45%
                    1
                           2.1                                  0%     100%       944.39      831.07     42%
                           1.2                                  0%     100%       904.20      795.69     45%
                    2
                           2.2                                  0%     100%       944.39      831.07     42%
                           1.3                                 20%     80%        958.80      843.75     42%
                    3
                           2.3                                 20%     80%       1,028.79     905.33     37%
                           1.4                                 20%     80%       1,007.77     886.83     39%
                    4
                           2.4                                 20%     80%       1,077.75     948.42     34%
                           1.5                                 20%     80%       1,014.38     892.65     38%
                    5
                           2.5                                 30%     70%       1,092.16     961.10     33%
                    6       0                                    -       -         0.00        0.00     100%
                    7       3                                  100%     0%       1,641.18    1,444.24    0%






                                           Single HS Track     Double HS Track









            288                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295