Page 159 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 159

Central versus Peripheral High-Speed Rail Stations: Opportunities For Companies to Relocate?
                   The cases of Reims Central Station and Champagne-Ardenne Station



                       Nevertheless,  despite  these  similarities,  each  station  is  characterized  by  different
                   dynamics. Around the central station, buildings were renovated or constructed ahead of
                   the arrival of HSR, and company locations in the area were not halted by the economic
                   crisis. By contrast, the crisis did have an impact on the development of the business parks
                   around Champagne‐Ardenne station, delaying their realization until 2015. Moreover, the
                   companies in each area tend to be from different business sectors. Lastly, the location
                   factors  for  firms  in  each  area  are  similar  but  not  identical  by  any  means. Around  both
                   stations, office availability and the image of the district are the main location factors,
                   but subsequent factors vary: the presence of HSR is a more important location factor in
                   Clairmarais, but one that appears some way down the list in the location‐factor hierarchy.
                   By contrast, it was more often cited as the number‐one location factor by firms located
                   near  the  peripheral  ChampagneArdenne  station.  Furthermore,  it  doesn’t  play  the  same
                   role in each area: while HSR is one element of more general accessibility considerations
                   in Bezannes, it is more important and used more in Clairmarais, where rail services to and
                   from Paris play a more essential role.

                   In  this  way,  by  inducing  a  dynamic  of  business‐district  or  business‐park  creation,  HSR
                   structures the urban space and segments it by function, with service‐sector activities in
                   the city centre and industry‐ and sales‐related administrative activities on the outskirts,
                   where firms can find large offices and good accessibility without the high costs of city‐
                   centre locations in terms of car parking and office rents.

                   To conclude, in the case of Reims, while location choice is partly linked to the type and
                   level of accessibility provided by HSR in each type of station, it also depends on the types
                   of firms in question, and in particular whether they are new or existing companies. For
                   newly created outside firms, the most important location factors are office space, access
                   to Paris, and lower rents than in Paris. For relocations within Reims, office availability and
                   the proximity of clients passing through the station are most important in the case of the
                   central station. Surprisingly, both surveys revealed that access of a large pool of qualified
                   jobs in the Paris region was not an important factor for firms choosing to locate in Reims. It
                   confirms that the economic climate is very important for business parks around peripheral
                   stations but not for business districts around central stations, as centrality seems to be an
                   insurance factor.

                   With  an  increase  in  the  number  of  services  to  and  from  Paris  –  combined  with  existing
                   services to Marne‐la‐Vallée Chessy and the fact that the future Grand Paris Express network
                   will link the east of the Paris region with the north and south without having to pass through
                   central Paris – the accessibility of Champagne‐Ardenne station could be highly improved.


                   6.     References

                       •  Agences d’urbanisme du Grand‐Est (2005), Les impacts territoriaux du TGV Est et
                          du TGV Rhin‐Rhône pour       les     agglomérations       du     Grand‐Est de la
                          France,. <http://www.adu‐montbeliard.fr/.../364.etu_ex_impacts_tgv_est_rhin_
                          rhone_050705.pdf>.

                       •  AUPHAN, E. (2002), “Le TGV Méditerranée: un pas décisif dans l’évolution du modèle
                          français à grande vitesse”. Méditerranée, 98(1–2):19–26.

                       •  BAZIN, S., BECKERICH, C., DELAPLACE, M.( 2009), Desserte TGV et localisation des entreprises
                          sur les quartiers d’affaires: nouvelle accessibilité ou nouvelle offre immobilière de bureaux
                          ? Le cas de la gare centre de Reims, Les Cahiers Scientifiques des Transports(56) : 37‐61


                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  157
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164