Page 44 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 44

Delaplace, Marie.




                 There are also inequalities between the rural world and the urban world because, within a
                 given country, wages in urban areas are higher than those that prevail in a rural environment.
                 As underlined by Perroux (1955, p. 309) “growth doesn’t appear everywhere at the same time;
                 rather, it appears in different areas or growth clusters with variable intensity”. For example,
                 in China in 2006, the incomes of the urban population were on average 3.55 times higher than
                 those of rural populations (Boquet, 2009) and this gap has grown as the country has developed
                 (1.7 times in 1984, 2.3 in 1992, 2.8 in 2000, 3.2 in 2004). Similarly, in Morocco, while 19% of the
                 Moroccan population lives below the national poverty line, 70% of these individuals live in rural
                 areas (Boutayeb, 2006). So what is the impact of high‐speed rail in the developing world, given
                 the levels of economic, social and spatial inequalities that characterize it?


                 3.    High‐speed rail and the issue of inequalities in developing countries

                 Mobility  has  become  necessary in  developed  countries.  Since  1982  in  France,  the  national
                 law on domestic transport (known as LOTI, or Loi d’orientation des transports intérieurs) has
                 institutionalized a right to transport, and mobility has become a right (Orfeuil, 2011, Urry,
                 2000, quoted by Cass et al., 2005). Indeed, this “rising value of contemporary societies is at the
                 same time a factor in the reinforcement of social inequalities” (Bacqué and Fol, 2007; see also
                 Cass, 2005 for the case of Great Britain), since without this right an individual cannot access a
                 whole series of activities and, increasingly, employment (Orfeuil, 2004, Bacqué and Fol, 2007).
                 The mobile processes and infrastructures of travel and transport can generate and reinforce
                 social exclusion (Cass et al., 2005). While the issue of inequalities associated with transport and
                 mobility is not new, it has to date mainly been addressed from the point of view of daily urban
                 mobility. However, high‐speed rail is also likely to reinforce inequalities. This is the case in
                 developed countries, but more particularly in developing countries, in part because high‐speed
                 rail does not serve all areas within these countries, but also because it can lead to economic
                 exclusion and exclusion in terms of access and use.
                       3.1     High‐speed rail and inequalities: an analytical framework


                 People do not always have the opportunity, income and/or skills to be mobile. The literature
                 defines social exclusion as the inability of individuals to access activities in which they need to
                 participate (Kenyon et al., 2002, Preston and Rajé, 2007 and Church et al., 2000, for an analysis
                 of social exclusion linked to transport, and Banister, 1994, on equity issues in transport). An
                 improvement in the transport offer associated with a high‐speed line can lead to inequalities
                 and be spatially inequitable in the sense that not everyone has access to it.
                 The issue of inequalities associated with high‐speed rail has recently been studied in developed
                 countries. In the case of Spain, Monzon et al. (2013) show that extensions of high‐speed rail
                 in  periurban  areas  have  led  to an  increase  in  spatial  imbalances  and  contribute  to a  more
                 polarized spatial development. Bouf and Desmaris (2015) consider that high‐speed rail lines
                 are spatially unfair in France, first because they promote growth in an unfair way, secondly
                 because the pricing system is unfair (ticket prices per kilometre vary according to the line and
                 are not proportional to the distance travelled), and lastly because the way in which they are
                 funded (amounts, types of contributors) vary significantly from one line to another. Kim and
                 Sultana (2015) point out that in South Korea spatial equity was diminished when the network
                 was extended in 2010/2011, as accessibility improvement was concentrated in cities located on
                 the first high‐speed corridor near the capital. Pagliara et al. (2016) show that in Italy people are
                 very sensitive to the cost of accessing high‐speed rail and the cost of high‐speed train tickets.
                 These costs have a strong impact on spatial equity.






             42                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49