Page 317 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 317

Regional diffusion and adoption effects on HSR demand expansion




                       The Bass model can also be interpreted by a hazard rate. The interpretation of the hazard is
                   that if it is multiplied by a small time increment it gives the probability that a random pur-
                   chaser who has not yet made the purchase will do so in the next small time increment (Wang,
                   2012). The hazard rate indicates “the portion that adopts at t given that they have not yet
                   adopted”, thus this formula can be written as follows:





                   The probability of adopting by those who have not yet adopted is regarded as a linear function
                   of those who have previously adopted it, i.e.







                   Where h(t) means the conditional likelihood that HSR users will adopt the innovation at exactly
                   time  t since  introduction,  given  that  the  users has not adopted  before that  time  ft is the
                   likelihood for any randomly selected individual to adopt at time t (Rate at which the probability
                   of adoption is changing at time t), and F(t) is the market saturation at time t (Probability
                   density function of adoption at time t). Yt is the accumulated number of customers who have
                   already adopted the innovation by time t and N is a parameter representing the total number
                   of HSR users in the adopting target segment, all of whom will eventually adopt HSR. p is the
                   “innovation coefficient”’ and q is the “imitation coefficient”. Bass (1969) calibrated the curve
                   and parameters p and q for a range of products ranging from lawn moreover to microwaves.
                   We hypothesize that we can use the product adoption model also to improve estimates regarding
                   HSR demand  uptake.  It  is important  to note  that  our interpretation  of  p and  q changes.
                   Originally in the model, the interpretation of these coefficientscan be directly associated with
                   “innovators” and “imitators”. In the case of HSR travel though it is not a “single purchase”
                   we are interested in but the general increase in using HSR. We therefore re-interpret p as
                   “innovative diverted demand” and q as “diverted and induced demand” considering features of
                   transport demand in this study as shown in Figure 4. Therefore p means here that demand plus
                   some initially diverted demand from other transport modes and q could be interpreted as later
                   diverted demand as well as newly induced demand through the existence of HSR.
                   In  the  following,  considering  HSR  utilization  as  demand  of  new  transportation,  we  confirm  the
                   diffusion phenomenon and further the rates of innovation and imitation are calculated on the basis
                   of a diffusion model based on the hypothesis as mentioned in above. We further estimate a model to
                   verify that there would be influences of city heterogeneity on diffusion phenomenon of HSR ridership.





















                                             Fig. 4 S-curve representing rate of HSR adoption over time


                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  315
   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322