Page 167 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 167

Which way to the city centre? Pedestrian itineraries between High Speed Rail stations and historic
                   centres. Assessing urban quality and tourist behaviour through GPS tracks in Toledo.



                       The aim of the article is to identify which of these itineraries is more used by tourists, and to
                   assess its physical characteristics linked with its walkability in order to check whether they are
                   relevant in terms of the path’s election. The GPS tracks shared by tourists in social networks
                   like wikiloc have been used to identify which are the tourist itineraries throughout the city.
                   Then, the walkability of itineraries has been assessed and compared.
                   The pedestrian paths in these small and medium cities with edge HSR stations are a key factor
                   for both tourists arriving to the city and residents commuting (or just travelling) by HSR. An
                   adequate, readable and comfortable itinerary will enhance the experience of the former and
                   will promote a sustainable transport mode for the latter. In many cases, the huge investments
                   of HSR construction are not accompanied by small expenditures in urban space enhancements
                   in order to provide a comfortable pedestrian access.
                   2.     Background


                          2.1     HSR stations and tourist itineraries

                   One of the main issues on HSR is the way in which cities are served by stations (Garmendia, et
                   al., 2012). As Bertolini and Split (1998) identified, train stations perform a twofold role. First,
                   from the transport approach, stations can be considered as nodal points, where the resulting
                   level of HSR service is of great importance. Second, from the urban approach, stations constitute
                   a landmark in the city. In the case of HSR, stations are often the pretext for ambitious urban
                   (renewal) projects and developments. The role of the historic train stations as “gate of the
                   city”, which had been overshadowed by the expansion of freeways and airports, is strengthened
                   by HSR stations (Mannone, 1997).
                   In order to assess both the impact  of a HSR station and the  strategies  developed by cities
                   to make the most of the new infrastructure, literature on HSR stations establishes different
                   typologies  of  HSR  stations  (Troin,  1995;  Bellet  et  al.,  2012).  These  classifications  consider
                   different criteria: if the station is new or an adaptation to HSR; the location of the station in
                   relation to the city; and the relevance of the station as a transportation node. However, the key
                   factor that has an influence on the urban development of the city is the location of the station
                   (Ureña, et al., 2012).
                   When  analyzing  small and  medium  cities,  Menéndez  et  al.  (2002)  consider three  types  of
                   stations: central, city-edge, and peripheral. Given their weaker position, edge or peripheral
                   settings  are  more  common,  making  urban  projects  more  difficult  to  succeed,  especially  in
                   peripheral settings (Auphan, 1992; Troin, 1995). Literature on the latter has focused mainly on
                   the tertiary or residential developments around HSR stations (Ribalaygua, 2005) and, taking
                   into account their isolated situation, on the connection of these stations to the city center
                   and to the historic train stations. This is the case of France, where new peripheral stations are
                   built for long distance HSR services, and old conventional stations maintain regional and some
                   of the HSR services (Facchinetti-Mannone & Richer, 2011). Finally, edge settings take advantage
                   of  the  lesser dense  urban  fabric of  the  city  outskirts, which  allows for  urban  development
                   projects around the station although the urban pattern continuity between the station and city
                   is guaranteed.
                   HSR intermodal opportunities have been studied from three different scales. From a national
                   and regional scale, the opportunities of HSR/conventional rail and HSR/air connections have
                   been assessed (Chapelon & Bozzani, 2003; López-Pita & Robusté, 2004; Givoni, 2006). From
                   a  local scale, the  literature has  focused on the  station-city  connections.  When  the  station
                   is central, the  connection  between  the  station  and the  transit  network  is a  principal  issue
                   (Peters, 2010), while in the peripheral ones specific shuttle services are necessary to assure
                   the connection (Facchinetti-Mannone & Richer, 2011; Menéndez, et al, 2006). In addition, the


                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  165
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172