Page 97 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 97

Test and Certification of Railway automation and digitalization approaches (Rail 4.0)
































                                            Figure 1: Overview of current setup of on-board train control
                   Figure 1 shows a basic setup of today s on-board train control. The communication to the track-
                   side is available by many technologies, in case of ETCS one of the communication modules
                   could be the GSM-R channel. The train interface is also already connected to the train control
                   system.  Information  and commands  are  exchanged,  e.g.  braking,  doors,  pantograph  or
                   localization information. In most cases the driver has to control the traction lever according to
                   the information of the train control system. From a technical perspective the main task of the
                   driver is supervision and responsibility for the train. The first part of this contribution will focus
                   the influence of ATO systems to the current testing methodologies.

                   2.     Testing on-board ATO modules


                          2.1     Changes in testing due to ATO

                   In the current implementations the on-board conformity tests are running 100% automatically.
                   Since the driver machine interface (DMI) has to be part of the test, because of the current law,
                   it is controlled by a robot. The train interface is controlled by the laboratory. In case of ATO
                   functions of the system-under-test these laboratory modules (robot and train interface) can be
                   replaced by the ATO module. At least if the ATO module is tested together with the on-board
                   train control (in case of ETCS this is called European Vital Computer, EVC) the test could be
                   performed in the same manner but with less effort on the laboratory side.  The interesting
                   question is what additional descriptions in the test specification are necessary to ensure the
                   proper testing of the ATO module. Since we assume a black-box test for the ATO module, the
                   first inspection has to be done on the interfaces of the module. Today there are many ideas
                   for these interfaces; one could be the reuse of the interface between the DMI and the EVC, in
                   case of ETCS. As long as there is a radio connection available between the track-side and the
                   onboard, all necessary information will be provided. For example a new movement authority is
                   transmitted to the train control system and the ATO simply has to follow this information. Today
                   it is shown with   permitted speed   and many more values on the DMI. I.e. for all information,
                   which is available via the current DMI, the functional test specification of ETCS
                   can be reused. Of course, the evaluation methods have to be adapted, because now not only the
                   train control behaviour has to checked but also the ATO behaviour (train interface unit, driver
                   machine interface etc.). If there are any additional inputs for the ATO-module, maybe cameras



                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  95
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102