Page 89 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 89

The role of the ertms users group in the consolidation of the ERTMS technical specification for
                   baselines 2 and 3



                       II.  The  feedback  from  the  commercial  experience  produced  a  great  number  of  “Change
                       Requests”.  These  were  proposals  for  the  improvement  of  the  System  Requirement
                       Specification resulting from the commercial exploitation. Commercial lines in exploitation
                       had  to migrate  continuously  to get  them  aligned  with  the  consecutive  versions  of  the
                       technical specification: SRS 2.0.0 -> SRS 2.2.2 -> SRS 2.3.0 -> SRS 2.3.0 D. This has been the
                       case of the Spanish Railway Administration, forced to migrate more than 1.000 Km of lines
                       and hundreds of trains.

                   III. The feedback from the exploitation of the Madrid – Lérida line showed that the harmonisation
                       of human factors was an open issue. For the first time, different suppliers of ERTMS On-
                       board equipment, operated on tracks equipped by different ERTMS suppliers. A comparative
                       study of the different DMIs, performed by CEDEX, forced the ERTMS Users Group to launch
                       a new working group on Human Factors. Three different approaches were needed to solve
                       this open point with experts on human factors, not linked to the technical world (HEROE
                       Project).

                       It is worthy to say that the operational interoperability is 50 % of the interoperability, the
                       other 50% being the technical interoperability. Due to this unexpected issue, the ERTMS
                       Users Group could not accomplish the operational harmonisation within the period of the
                       pilot lines. It is only with the launch of the ERTMS Baseline 3, that the DMI specification
                       becomes harmonised and its specification becomes mandatory. The Human Factors Working
                       Group, transferred to ERA from  the  ERTMS Users Group, accomplished  the  operational
                       harmonisation.

                   IV.  The handover between the RBCs at the border between Holland and Belgium in the Dutch
                       High Speed Line South caused a major problem. The trains ought to cross the border in Level
                       1, disconnecting from the handing over RBCs to solve the problem. This patch, also used
                       in other countries, had a big impact on the exploitation of the High Speed line due to the
                       speed limitation in Level 1.

                       UNISIG  came  with  two  proposals  for  the  specification  of  the  RBC  handover,  asking  the
                       ERTMS Users Group to choose the most convenient one. The election made was the basis for
                       Subset-098 specification.
                   V.  The starting of the commercial exploitation of the Spanish High Speed Line between Madrid
                       and Lérida in ERTMS Level 1 was quite problematic due to the lack of reliability of the
                       Eurobalises. This critical situation was solved thanks to an illegal duplication of fixed balises,
                       placing contiguously two identical balises. If one balise was failing once every one thousand
                       of readings, the two contiguous balises had a failure estimated in one every one million of
                       readings, solving miraculously the problem. It is worthy to mention the role played by Mr.
                       Jorge Iglesias in solving this crisis that could have strong political consequences.
                   VI. The Spanish High-Speed network includes the Madrid-Sevilla line, equipped with the German
                       system LZB. A fleet of hundred high speed trains purchased by RENFE ought to operate on
                       the ERTMS new lines and also on the Madrid – Sevilla line. This was forcing the Spanish
                       Administration to request the STM for LZB, as proposed by UNISIG. At the end, major part
                       of the train fleet was equipped with LZB onboard equipment operating independently from
                       ERTMS because the LZB STM was not available. Today the use of STMs is optional and only
                       trains equipped by Bombardier incorporate the LZB STM.
                   VII. The  continuous  evolution  of  the  ERTMS  Technical  Specifications  forced  the  Spanish
                       Infrastructure Manager ADIF to undertake a continuous migration of their high-speed lines.
                       Today all lines are aligned to the SRS version 2.3.0 D. New trains purchased by the Spanish
                       operator RENFE will be  equipped  with  EVCs of  Baseline  3,  the  backwards  compatibility
                       between both consecutive versions is a challenge that will be verified at commercial level
                       within the following years.

                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  87
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94