Page 413 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 413

A first evaluation of the relationship between High Speed Rail (HSR) and the tourism sector in Turkey: The cases of
                   two Turkish cities



                       2.   Literature on HSR and tourism


                   Tourism-related service sectors play an important role in the regional development of the
                   European Union countries. HSR service has a role in increase in tourist travel, and tourism and
                   service sectors are therefore directly affected (Lumsdon and Page, 2004). Among different
                   kinds, urban and business tourism and in-situ tourism (parks, etc.) appear to be the main
                   types of tourism likely to benefit from an HSR service, when the station is located inside the
                   destination. Compared to car journeys, traveling by HSR allows passengers to get to their
                   destination faster while being able to relax and at the same time, avoid road congestion and
                   the increasing difficulties associated with accessing the heart of the city. Compared to air
                   travel, it also saves the time lost in travelling between the airport and final destination. In
                   fact, all forms of forms of tourism in the city could benefit from HSR services; but, tourism
                   forms outside cities (i.e. green tourism or mountain tourism) often benefit less from HSR,
                   unless inter-modality issues are managed to reach their destinations without significant time
                   losses.
                   Ex-post identified impacts of HSR on tourism can be positive as well as negative or inexistent
                   (see Table 1 and Table 2). Positive impacts (expected or realized) can be listed as widening the
                   tourism markets (increasing the number of tourists, tourism trips, occupancy rates, foreign
                   arrivals, tourism revenues, etc.), improving the accessibility of the destinations (increasing the
                   winter-sport tourism, urban tourism, business tourism). It can also reinforce the competition
                   between tourist destinations (which can be positive or negative). For example, in Spain, Urena
                   et  al.  (2009)  argued  that  large  intermediate  cities  served  by  HSR  such  as  Zaragoza  and  in
                   particular Córdoba were experiencing an increase in urban tourism and business tourism. This
                   was confirmed by Alonso and Bellet (2009) in the case of Zaragoza. Similarly Todorovitch et al.
                   (2011) reported that tourism had grown by 15% annually in Lleida. Guirao and Campa (2015)
                   also reported how HSR was important for tourism in Toledo: over thirty percent of weekday
                   HSR ridership was linked to tourism mobility. But a recent report in Spain suggested that “the
                   positive impacts of HSR on the number of visitors, the number of nights spent at destination
                   and/or hotel occupancy rates were mostly restricted, at best, to larger cities, but in most
                   cases the impacts are minimal or even negative” (Albalate et al., 2015).

                   An increase in tourist movements was mentioned in big cities in Taiwan (Cheng, 2009) as
                   well in Chinese cities such as Wuhan (Wang et al., 2012), Qufu (People’s Republic of China,
                   2014),  and  Ningbo  (Zhao,  2012).  Provinces  served  by  HSR  in  China  “were  likely  to  have
                   approximately 20% more foreign arrivals and 25% more in tourism revenue than provinces
                   without such systems” (Chen and Haynes, 2012). Seeking theoretical foundations of the main
                   impacts of HSR on China tourism, Wang et al. (2012) are using the gravitational and the iso-
                   tourist line models with integrating the time–space replacement mechanism. They identified
                   three kinds of impacts: i) an enlargement and a transformation of tourism market space,
                   ii) intensification of the market competition on a larger scale, and iii) a redistribution of
                   tourism centres.
                   On the other hand, HSR may have negative impacts (expected or realized) such as decrease
                   in overnights stay and tourist revenues. In France there is no growth in small cities and for
                   winter-sports tourism. A reduction in the average length of stay and in the number of nights
                   spent in a city is likely to occur because HSR opens up the possibility of same-day round
                   trips. As an example, in Le Mans in France, the arrival of HSR has contributed to reducing the
                   duration of events and, conversely, to promoting non-residential events, i.e. fewer events
                   lasting several days but more one-day events. In this city, the average length of stay decreased
                   a few years after the arrival of HSR. Furthermore, events had an average duration one day
                   shorter than that generally encountered for national conferences in France in the mid-1990s
                   (Amiard, 1997).

                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  411
   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418