Page 40 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 40

Schumann, Tilo. Meyer zu Hörste, Michael. Heckmann, Andreas. Lemmer, Karsten.




                 Wear is another aspect to be taken into account. In order to transmit tangential forces it is
                 required to violate the ideal rolling condition at the wheel-rail interface, i.e. there is a small
                 relative motion between the contact partners, which leads to sliding friction [14]. Wear or
                 more precisely the volume of abrasive removed material is related to the associated frictional
                 work [15]. However, wear and rail corrugation are very complex processes, so that a general
                 statement how they depend on the train speed is difficult and out of reach in the given context.
                 Just in order to get an  idea,  a multibody simulation of a today’s articulated highspeed train
                 with  6  cars,  two  bogies  each  car,  16t  load  per  wheel-set,  running  on  a  straight  track  was
                 performed considering track irregularities. The material abrasion at the wheels per traveling
                 distance as a function of vehicle speed was evaluated on a trial basis. The exemplary results
                 in Figure 3 expose a rough trend: wheel wear for guidance grows progressively with the train
                 speed.

                 The wear partition associated to traction, i.e. longitudinal dynamics, grows less intense but
                 still with the fourth power of the vehicle speed as shown in Figure 3. This characteristic is based
                 on the fact that the longitudinal forces at the wheel-rail interface depend on the resistance
                 forces which in turn are dominated by the aerodynamic drag at very high velocities.
                 The traction potential itself is as well a function of the running speed. According to the prominent
                 historical survey by Curtius and Kniffler [16], the friction coefficient converges asymptotically
                 against μ = 0.16 on average for very high speeds, while the lower bound of the measurements
                 indicates μ = 0.1 to be a very reliable figure. The aerodynamic drag may approach values of
                 approximately 200 kN at 600 km/h, which requires 13 wheel axles each loaded with 16 t be
                 counterbalanced by traction with μ = 0.1. This appears to be feasible but indicates the necessity
                 to power as much wheels as possible in order to fully exploit the available traction potential.
                 That’s why one intermediate car of TGV 150 that set the world speed record of 574.8 km/h in
                 2007 was equipped with additional powered running gears [17].

                       3.2     Aerodynamics

                 Usually the aerodynamic forces like the drag scale with the stagnation pressure ρV²/2, where
                  is the density of the air and V is the incident flow velocity in the reference frame of the
                 vehicle. In still air V corresponds directly to the driving speed U. It follows that the power which
                 is required to equalize the aerodynamic drag is proportional to U³, and at higher speeds the
                 aerodynamic drag will exceed the effect of mechanical friction [18].
                 However, today’s driving speeds up to 600 km/h correspond to a Mach number of M ≈ 0.5, so
                 that new aerodynamic effects associated to the compressibility of the fluid enter the picture.
                 The critical Mach number specifies the lowest Mach number at which the airflow over some
                 point of the train reaches the speed of sound. Above this critical Mach number the aerodynamic
                 quality of the vehicle will degenerate rapidly. To push the critical Mach number above M = 0.5 a
                 train requires a relatively long pointed nose similar to the Japanese Maglev train [19].
                 A highly safety relevant aerodynamic aspect concerns the crosswind stability in particular if
                 lightweight design is under consideration. Although newer train head designs show elements
                 to reduce the cross-wind forces [20], [21] , the optimization potential is limited in general.
                 Investigations with the NGT train concept support the assumption that operational train speeds
                 beyond 400 km/h require a specific device to prevent the lift-off and overturning of the vehicle
                 as it is proposed in [22] or as it is conceptually given by the MAGLEV guidance system. An
                 alternative way to deal with the cross-wind issue at higher speeds is to protect the train from
                 strong gusts using wind fences. Such fences could act as sound barrier at the same time and
                 help to reduce noise emissions of high speed trains.

                 Another safety relevant aspect concerns the aerodynamic loads which the flow around the train
                 induces on its surrounding.  These loads typically as well scale with the square of the driving



             38                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45