Page 308 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 308

Balmaseda, Lucía. Gallego, Inmaculada. Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos. Rivas, Ana.




                 unknown, iteration is necessary to obtain a converged value of the stiffness based on a certain
                 static load value.
                 Different types of infrastructures were selected. For each infrastructure, the static stiffness
                 was calculated by entering the static load in the software and consecutively applying it to
                 four sleepers to simulate the passage of an axle. With the static stiffness value obtained, an
                 initial dynamic overload value was calculated. With the total value of the load, the model was
                 recalculated and an initial dynamic stiffness value was obtained. This process was iterated
                 twice; the dynamic rigidity values obtained are listed in Table 2.
                                                               Table 2.

                                Static and dynamic stiffness values (kN/mm) and their ratios.


                   TYPE OF TRANSITION     STIFFNESS (KN/mm)    SLEEPER 5  SLEEPER 6  SLEEPER 7  SLEEPER 8


                                         K static                10.800      11.195      10.997     11.263
                   Embankment=QS2
                                         K dynamic               12.705      13.023      13.137     13.337
                   Natural ground=QS1
                                         K dynamic / K static    1.1763      1.1633      1.1976     1.1841
                                         K static                54.186      54.985      55.476     55.808
                   Embankment=QS3
                                         K dynamic               55.956      55.671      57.216     57.073
                   Natural ground=QS1
                                         K dynamic / K static    1.0326      1.0125      1.0313     1.0226
                                         K static                16.380      16.658      16.823     16.915
                   Embankment=QS2
                                         K dynamic               18.747      19.106      19.335     19.431
                   Natural ground=QS2
                                         K dynamic / K static    1.1445      1.1469      1.1493     1.1487

                                         K static                59.936      60.519      60.915     60.519
                   Embankment=QS3
                                         K dynamic               61.151      61.735      62.171     62.094
                   Natural ground=QS2
                                         K dynamic / K static    1.0203      1.0200      1.0206     1.0261

                                                       (Source: Gallego, 2012).


                 From Table 2, we note that

                 •  The dynamic stiffness is always greater than the static stiffness, as expected.
                 •  The difference between the static stiffness and dynamic stiffness decreases as the stiffness
                    value is increased.
                 •  Structures with very elastic infrastructure have 18% greater dynamic stiffness. Rail track
                    structures  with  a  stiffness  of  approximately  50  and  60  KN/mm  have  approximately  2%
                    greater dynamic stiffness, which is almost negligible.

                 Since the minimum appropriate stiffness for high-speed rail infrastructures is 60 KN/mm; the
                 recommended values are 70 and 80 KN/mm. In these cases, the difference between the static
                 stiffness and the dynamic stiffness is very small; use of the simplifying assumption that the
                 static stiffness is equal to the dynamic stiffness seems reasonable.





            306                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313