Page 142 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 142

Beckerich, Christophe. Benoit, Sylvie. Delaplace, Marie.




                 There is an attractiveness effect at the intraregional level for firms already located in the same
                 city or region before the arrival of HSR, but this effect doesn’t exist at the interregional level
                 (Willigers, 2008). For other authors, HSR brings no major changes in terms of attractiveness for
                 businesses (RFF, 2010, Mannone, 1995, Bazin et al., 2009), while for others still HSR is rarely, in
                 itself, a location factor (Mannone, 1997; Sands, 1993; Kamel and Matthewman, 2008; Haynes,
                 1997): “The majority of offices that choose a high‐speed train station site, would also have
                 chosen this location in a situation without high‐speed trains” (Willigers, 2008, 262).
                 Others consider that the effect of HSR depends on the type of station, with comparisons made
                 between peripheral and central stations (Mannone, 2009) or between central and intermediate
                 stations  (Vickerman,  2015),  for  example.  With  regard  to  intermediate  stations,  “there  has
                 been little identifiable local economic development associated with many of these stations“
                 (Vickerman, 2015, p. 157).
                 Moreover,  among  peripheral  stations,  there  is  a  heterogeneity  due  to  valorization  policies
                 (Mannone, 2010, 2013; Bellet, 2016).
                 In  reference  to  the  case  of Amsterdam,  Willigers  (2008)  points  out  that  a  central  location
                 tends to be favoured by companies whose employees frequently require access to international
                 destinations because central stations offer better international connexions.
                 Peripheral locations are favoured by service‐sector firms oriented towards the national market
                 because accessibility is better. Finally, Willigers and van Wee point out that, in the case of
                 Netherlands, it depends on the kind of HSR services: while “international HST services can have
                 a considerable impact on the attractiveness of an office location […], domestic HST services are
                 less important for location choices, because of the small domestic distances” (Willigers and van
                 Wee, 2011, p. 9).


                       2.2     Developments around central and peripheral HSR stations: a review
                 From an empirical point of view, the location of firms around central stations sometimes takes
                 time, and the firms present are not always those that one might expect (firms in highly qualified
                 sectors). Ultimately, though, firms do move in to occupy the business real‐estate programmes
                 induced by the arrival of HSR.
                 In  Spain,  Bellet  et  al.  (2012)  show  that  HSR  services  favour  urban  renewal  around  central
                 stations. In London, the Eurostar service at St Pancras has been considered a key factor in
                 encouraging the location of financial companies in the King’s Cross–St Pancras district (GLA,
                 2008,  Bertolini and  Spit,  1998,  Murakami  and  Cervero, 2012).  Similarly, in France,  HSR has
                 induced urban renewal and associated dynamics around central stations, and their districts seem
                 to be successful, even if in some cases location decisions have been postponed by economic
                 crisis. This was the case for the Novaxis business district in Le Mans in 1993, for example, but
                 not in Reims, where available offices have been sold very quickly following their construction
                 (Bazin et al., 2009; Beckerich et al., 2016). Around peripheral stations, the literature shows
                 that business parks developed to coincide with the arrival of HSR were not successful, even
                 when local stakeholders had keenly anticipated the arrival, as shown by Fachinetti‐Mannone
                 (1997, 2010). In Vendôme, in the middle of the 1980s, a ZAD2 of 140 hectares was designed to
                 play host to a technological park, with serviced development plots made available according to
                 demand. The aim was to create 1,000 jobs (Bellanger, 1991). In 2004, nearly 15 years after the
                 inauguration of the Atlantic HSL (“LGV Atlantique” in French), only 16 companies had located
                 on this site near Vendôme TGV station (occupying just a little more than 8 hectares). In 2010,
                 this number had risen to 22, covering a mere 6.6% of the total surface area of the business park
                 (Fachinetti‐Mannone, 2010).
                 2    ZAD: a  zone d’aménagement  différé, or  deferred‐development  area,  i.e. a  planned  development  area  where the  public
                 authorities have compulsory‐purchase powers.


            140                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147