Page 144 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 144

Beckerich, Christophe. Benoit, Sylvie. Delaplace, Marie.




                 network (Martin, 1997). Nevertheless, according to Crozet, the positive impacts of accessibility
                 gains on productivity are conditional (Crozet, 2015). In such cases, the station with the better
                 accessibility will be preferred. But, as quoted by Banister and Givoni (2011), journey time by
                 high‐speed train is not the only transport time to take into account. Access and egress times
                 – the amount of time it takes to get to and from stations – could also reduce the time savings
                 generated by HSR.
                 Third, establishing a firm in the district around an HSR station may facilitate access to larger
                 pools of skilled labour insofar as HSR services make it possible to bring cities closer together
                 in terms of the time taken to cover the distance between them. In cases like these, the labour
                 force living in such cities would find it easier to come and work for firms located in the station
                 districts of cities served by HSR. In this way, HSR would enlarge the labour market (Preston,
                 2009, Cheng, 2009, Kamel and Matthewman, 2008) and improve the mobilization of highly
                 skilled labour (Haynes 1997). In this case, it is again the issue of access to different transport
                 modes,  including  conventional  rail  transport  (Willigers,  2011),  that  is  crucial,  whether  the
                 station is central or peripheral.
                 Fourth, while the function of the stations is to be rail hubs or more generally transport hubs,
                 they are also increasingly public spaces (Bertolini and Spit, 1998). By generating urban renewal
                 and refurbishment operations around stations (Terrin, 2011, Pol, 2008, Bazin et al., 2009 &
                 2010, Yin et al., 2014), high‐speed rail services reinforce the role of the station as a public
                 space (De Jong, 2009, Mannone, 1997), a veritable urban hub (Bourdin, 2011) characterized
                 by  different  types  of  flows,  in  particular  flows  of  people.  Establishing  a  firm  in  a  station
                 district may ensure proximity for customers passing through the station. In this case, it is the
                 proximity to end customers who use rail transport – though not necessarily HSR transport – that
                 would explain the location of tertiary and commercial activities around central stations. But
                 peripheral stations could also generate new urban centrality in dynamic ways, in particular
                 when  they  are  characterized  by  residential  real‐estate  programmes.  Lastly,  the  choice  to
                 locate in a peripheral area or a central area depends on the cost and the value of each location
                 for a given firm. Within a given city, the cost of a location depends on business realestate
                 prices; indeed, real estate is the second‐largest expense after labour within most organizations
                 (Ward, 2016). But as regards the price of residential real estate (Beckerich, 2001), and as
                 shown by the hedonic pricing method (Lancaster, 1966; Rosen, 1974, Nappi‐Choulet et al.,
                 2007), the value of an area first depends on the amenities it provides. And these amenities are
                 linked in turn to accessibility and more generally to different public policies with respect to
                 education, employment, and so forth. Amenities are more plentiful in the city centre (Crouzet,
                 2003) because centrality offers more externalities in terms of transport and information than
                 peripherality (Crouzet, 2003). Consequently, the price of business real estate is higher in the
                 city centre than in the periphery. A firm looking for a location thus has to arbitrate between
                 land and real‐estate costs and centrality.
                 In cases where sensitivity to land and real‐estate prices is high and large plots of land or offices
                 are required for the company’s activity, a peripheral location may be favoured. However, from
                 a dynamic perspective, such location choices could lead to tertiary companies also seeking to
                 locate around peripheral stations, resulting ultimately in price increases (see also Willigers,
                 2011).
                 To conclude, location choice can be linked to the type and level of accessibility of each type
                 of station, to the type of customer proximity sought (customers passing through the station or
                 clients located in other cities served by HSR), to the need for access to a large pool of qualified
                 labour, to the existence of local clients, to the existence of other companies, and to the cost
                 of real estate.





            142                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149