Page 319 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 319

Development of an alternative maintenance technique for railway ballasted tracks




                       2016a). For each maintenance solution, this test began over the conventional section (rail,
                   sleeper, fastenings, rail pad and ballast, without USPs and without blown stones), and it was
                   stopped when the settlement was close to 15 mm and the loading cycles reached approximately
                   50,000. Following this procedure, a maintenance task was carried out to recover the track
                   geometry, whereupon the test continued until its completion (200,000 cycles). This method was
                   applied twice for all the techniques studied.

                   The conventional stoneblowing process was conducted after the ballast settlement (up to
                   approximately 15 mm, as indicated previously) by lifting the rail-fastener-sleeper system,
                   and  adding  the  small  stones  between  the  sleeper  and  the  ballast  surface,  which  allowed
                   for recovering the original position of the sleeper. In this laboratory work, the process of
                   adding the stones was developed by hand (without compressed air) since the main objective
                   of this initial study was to show the effect of the elastic components, and in particular to
                   examine the feasibility of using rubber particles as flexible stones. The volume of stones and
                   distribution under the sleeper was in agreement with the findings of other authors (Nutbrown
                   and Nicholas, 1999; Tutumluer et al., 2015). Finally, the sleeper piece was returned to its
                   original position (corresponding to its location before ballast settlement), and the dynamic
                   test was continued.

                   Regarding the combination of stoneblowing with the different elastic elements, in the
                   case of USPs, these components were glued to the bottom of the sleeper by using epoxy
                   resin while the process of stoneblowing was carried out, and then the sleeper with the
                   pad was again placed over the ballast and the stones blown. In reference to the rubber
                   particles (RP) used for stone-rubber blowing process, they were mixed with the natural
                   stones so that both materials were applied at the same time. The quantities of rubber
                   analyzed were 10%, 25% and 50% over the total volume of the mix of elastic particles and
                   natural stones.


                   3.     Analysis of results


                   Figure 3 analyses the influence of adding different quantities of rubber particles (as
                   replacement of natural small aggregates used during stoneblowing intervention) on the
                   variation in mechanical performance of the global section in comparison to the effect
                   of  only  apply  stoneblowing  process  (without  including  innovative  elastic  solutions).
                   Also, as a referent elastic element to analyse the effect of rubber particles, Figure 3
                   shows the impact of including USPs in combination with stoneblowing process.

                   It  is  possible  to  understand  that  the  inclusion  of  USPs  and  rubber  particles  during
                   stoneblowing  operation,  leads  to  an  important  reduction  in  track  stiffness  while
                   increasing the damping capacity of the section, limiting the negative effect of stiffening
                   of  the  track  when  conventional  stoneblowing  is  applied. Also,  results  show  that  the
                   use of different percentages of rubber particles allows for gradually varying the track
                   performance,  obtaining  comparable  results  to  those  measured  for  USPs.  Indeed,  the
                   replacement of more than 50% of stones with rubber particles presents a comparable
                   reduction in section stiffness to that obtained with soft USPs while a percentage around
                   10% could be appropriate to use this solution as alternative to stiff USPs. Then, it is seen
                   that the mix of different ratios of rubber particles and stones for track maintenance
                   would allow for the optimization of its vertical stiffness, which is particularly beneficial
                   in transition sections where a gradual change in stiffness is required.






                   International Congress on High-speed Rail: Technologies and Long Term Impacts - Ciudad Real (Spain) - 25th anniversary Madrid-Sevilla corridor  317
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324