Page 66 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 66

Givoni, Moshe. Chen, Xueming.




                       2.2     The emergence of the Integrated hub in China


                 China is experiencing rapid economic growth and fast expansion of transport infrastructure in
                 recent years. For example, in China, the number of civil airports increased from 94 in 1990 to
                 175 in 2010 and is expected to reach 244 in 2020 (Fu, Anming, and Zheng 2012). At the same
                 time, China is fast developing its HSR network largely to accommodate the increase in demand
                 for rail transport, i.e., for capacity reasons (ibid.; Chen 2012), similar to what was the case
                 in Japan and France, albeit at a much larger scale. The intermediate and long-term plans for
                 the HSR network were first published in 2004 and later updated in 2008 by the then Ministry of
                 Railways, subject to approval by the State Council (Chen 2012). By the end of 2015, the total
                 operating length of China’s HSR network had reached 190000 km . The network model of HSR in
                                                                                1
                 China is that of a ‘comprehensive national’ and its backbone consists of four east-west and four
                 north-south lines (ibid.). By 2020, the Chinese HSR network is expected to link all provincial
                 cities  and  cities  with  a population  of  over  half a million (Chen  2012).  These  figures  have
                 already made China the largest HSR network in the world and an almost ideal case for airline
                 and railway integration, considering also the regulatory environment that might be more open
                 for cooperation between the modes (see below).
                 Moreover, in the development of HSR in China, strategic consideration was given to the location
                 of the stations, with respect to which cities are served (which is obvious) and the function
                 of each station as a hub in the HSR network. As Hickman et al. (2015) illustrate (Figure 2,
                 180), the network consists of several tiers of ‘hub’ stations, or ‘multimodal interchange hubs,’
                 which range from superlarge to large and medium hubs – those which offer interchange with
                 multiple transport modes, and more modest small and basic hubs. The position of a station
                 in the hub hierarchy is determined by the operational volume of the station. Hickman et al.
                 (2015) note that the Chinese rail hubs often have very large, airport-style, multilevel buildings
                 (see also Chen, Hickman, and Saxena 2014). In this context, the need to integrate the air and
                 rail networks has been identified and more than 32 Chinese airports are planning HSR links and
                 turning the airports into transport hubs (Fu, Anming, and Zheng 2012). According to Givoni
                 and Banister (2007), for an airport to be suitable for air-rail integration, it would be better to
                 have the railway station situated at the airport and the station should offer a high-frequency
                 service (not necessarily HSR service) to many destinations, as noted above.
                 Rail services in China are categorized according to the types of service offered (see Appendix
                 A). This categorization lends itself for the consideration of air–rail relationship. Train services
                 of types G and D – the fastest services – are those where HSR is most likely to successfully
                 compete with aircraft services. On train services of types C, Z, T, K and S – where routes tend
                 to  be  relatively  short  (and  speed  varies  but,  with  the  exception  of C  trains,  is lower than
                 200 km/h) – rail is more suitable to complement aircraft services. Considering the Integrated
                 Hub model (Figure 1), rail services G and D can substitute current aircraft services, while rail
                 services C, Z, T and K can complement current aircraft services.
                 3.    Shanghai Hongqiao Integrated Transport Hub


                 Shanghai  Hongqiao  Integrated  Transport Hub  best  illustrates  the  concept  of  the  Integrated
                 Hub in China and it can be used as a case study to analyze air–rail integration as in Chen and
                 Lin (2016), or as a case study of air-rail disintegration as done in this paper. This section first
                 describes the physical characteristics of the hub and the supply of services, it then examines
                 the demand for services at the hub before describing the regulatory framework within which
                 the hub is operated. The data used and described below are similar to that used by Chen and
                 Lin (2016) in their analysis.






             64                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71