Page 236 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 6
P. 236

Kim, Junghwa. Li, Yeun-Touh. Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk.




                 determines the right number of components in the mixture model (Lee and Timmermans, 2007;
                 Kim et al. 2013). In this study, we are going to confirm which model has a high model fit and
                 then to select more appropriate models between the two based on BIC with consideration of
                 AIC. Those formulas are:











                 where LL is the value of the log-likelihood function at convergence and means the level of
                 model fit, K is the number of parameters in the model, and N is the total sample size (Wen
                 and Lai 2010; Kim et al. 2013). Through BIC and AIC values reported in Table 4, it could be
                 an appropriate way to check which model is better. Since LL indicates the level of model
                 fit, the model which has a lower value of AIC and BIC could be selected. A comparison of
                 BIC and AIC values indicated that model 2 which considered  THSR station accessibility
                 could be identified the proper model than model 1 in order to explain THSR ridership.




                                    Table 4. AIC and BIC analyses for model selection



                                                   Log-likelihood at
                      Model           df                                          AIC              BIC
                                                     convergence


                     Model 1          11                160.829               -299.6584         -248.8523


                     Model 2          14                289.798               -551.5967         -486.9344




                 6.    Discussion and Conclusion



                 Our  analysis  suggests  that  differences  in  regions  economic  developments  and  city
                 characteristics would influence HSR demand pattern. Furthermore, in discussion on the
                 demand impact from THSR access links, our result shows analysis that improvement of
                 access  links  does  seem  to  affect  ridership.  It  also  suggests  that  access  links  of  public
                 transportation appear to be important factors to induce HSR ridership. The result also
                 indicates bus service (shuttle bus and BRT) would induce more demand than rail services
                 (MRT/TR). The THSR accessibility improvement is essential from our observation, once the
                 link connects to those which located in peripheral locations, it generally induces THSR
                 station demand. In addition, especially our findings illustrate the demand influenced by
                 station’s allocation, the one closed to city center had attracted more ridership. Our models
                 capture the effect of accessibility to the station as well as socioeconomic variables which
                 show regional heterogeneity on HSR demand by using panel data. Clearly this finding would
                 support our hypothesis to model estimation.






            234                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241