Page 366 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 366

Campos Zaldiernas, Javier. Díaz García, Sarai. Galán Alguacil, Álvaro. González Pérez, Javier.




                 risk assessment considering the current and the forecasted scenario. Since the economic
                 repercussion  of  the  actions  to  be  undertaken  can  be  considered  virtual  benefits,  it  is
                 possible to carry out a profitability analysis of the set of potential remedial works previously
                 determined, according to the service life of each action considered.

                 Once this analysis is performed, it is possible to prioritize the actions according to the profitability
                 indicators provided in the short, medium and long term, not only to evaluate the profitability of
                 different potential actions in the same asset, but to select the most profitable updates linked
                 to the set of culverts studied of a particular railway network, and prioritizing its implantation
                 during a reference period of time.
                 The type of remedial works to be implemented in the profitability analysis fit the most common
                 pathologies detected in culverts:

                 •  Restitution of the culvert barrels (increasing hydraulic capacity of the culvert during peak
                    flows).
                 •  Erosion protection measures at inlets/outlets.
                 •  Restitution and repair works in headwalls and wingwalls, according to the current condition
                    of the asset.
                 •  Restitution and repair works inside the culvert barrels, leakage prevention measures.

                 •  Removal of blockage elements (debris and vegetation) inside the culvert barrels.

                 In conclusion, this works outlines the necessity of having a methodology for identifying and
                 prioritizing investments projects in culvert maintenance widely supported by robust applications
                 capable  of  massively analysing  overall culvert  risk conditions  in  transport  networks.  Global
                 analysis of the results could lead to the establishment of a common management framework
                 including alert and support-decision systems implementation in the planning and execution of
                 investments in preventive maintenance actions of culverts.
                 5.    Acknowledgments


                 The development of the methodology proposed in this document and its application has been
                 carried out thanks to the development of specific calculation and management tools inside the
                 HidraSmart-CM (Culvert Management) project (Hidralab S.L.)

                 6.    References



                 •  Balkham M., Fosbeary C., Kitchen A., Rickard C., 2010. Culvert design and operation guide.
                    CIRIA Publishing, London, UK.
                 •  Federal Highway Administration, 2010. Culvert assessment and decision-making procedures
                    manual. U.S.Department of Transportation.
                 •  Galán A., Diaz S., Gonzalez J., 2016. Erosión local a la entrada y a la salida de obras de
                    drenaje transversal. XXVII Congreso latinoamericano de Hidráulica, 2016.
                 •  Najafi  M.,  Bhattachar,  D.,  2010.  Development  of  a  culvert  inventory  and  inspection
                    framework for asset management of road structures. Journal of King Saud UniversityScience
                    32, 243-254.




            364                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371