Page 262 - 360.revista de Alta Velocidad - Nº 5
P. 262

Jiménez, Pablo Lorenzo. Zamorano, Clara Isabel. Escobar, Adrián. Escobar, Jorge.




                           influence the dynamic behaviour of trains, and therefore, on their elements,
                           such  as  wheels  (producing,  for  example,  flat  wheels).  Thus,  tracks  in  worse
                           condition, which are going to cause greater damage on the trains, would have
                           higher charges, which is a contradiction.

                 •  The wear of the elements is considered completely attributable to the passage of
                    trains, and does not consider the influence of time.


                 In this paper, an idea of a methodological proposal for the calculation of infrastructure
                 maintenance direct costs has been posed, based on the use of asset management tools.
                 This proposal, correctly calibrated, would allow a realistic approximation to the costs
                 directly incurred by the passage of a train.


                 7.    References

                    •  ADIF (2011) Gestión de Activos en Administradores de Infraestructura Ferroviaria.

                    •  Estrategias Ferroviarias Europeas. Número 50. Marzo 2011.

                    •  ADIF (2017). Network Statement

                    •  ADIF AV (2017). Network Statement

                    •  ANDERSSON, M.; SMITH, A., WIKBERG, A. & WHEAT, P. (2011). Estimating the marginal
                       cost of railway track renewals using corner solution models. (No. TRV 2010/92179).
                       Stockholm. Retrieved from

                       http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-5361

                    •  FERNÁNDEZ  ARÉVALO,  FRANCISCO  JAVIER.  (2013).  Bases  económicas  para  la
                       regulación del canon por uso de la infraestructura ferroviaria. Revista de Derecho
                       de la Unión Europea. Nº 25. Pp. 205-220.


                    •  LARSSON,  D.  &  GUNNARSSON,  J.  (2001). A  Model  to  predict  Track  Degradation
                       Costs. 7th International Heavy Haul Conference.

                    •  NIELSEN, D., SPIRYAGIN, M., & COLE, C. (2016). A model to estimate infrastructure
                       damage costs for different train types. In CORE 2016, Maintaining the Momentum,
                       Conference on Railway Excellence, Melbourne, Victoria, 16-18 May 2016.
                    •  SMITH,  A.  S.,  KAUSHAL,  A.,  ODOLINSKI,  K.,  IWNICKI,  S.,  &  WHEAT,  P.  (2014).
                       Estimating  the  damage  and  marginal  cost  of  different  vehicle  types  on  rail
                       infrastructure: combining economic and engineering approaches.

                    •  SMITH,  A.,  IWNICKI,  S.,  KAUSHAL,  A.,  ODOLINSKI,  K.,  &  WHEAT,  P.  (2017).
                       Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and
                       engineering approaches. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,
                       Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 231(5). Pp. 620-636.

                    •  UNE-EN 13306:2011. Mantenimiento. Terminología del mantenimiento.

                    •  UNE-EN  13848-1:2004+A1:2009.  Aplicaciones  ferroviarias.  Vía.  Calidad  de  la
                       geometría de vía. Parte 1: Caracterización de la geometría de vía.



            260                                                                             360.revista de alta velocidad
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267